Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Anti-war? Um, kinda...NOT

Obamafluff just suggested that we not end the war, just re-situate it:

Obama might send troops into Pakistan

"He confuses our mission," Obama said, then he spread responsibility to lawmakers like Clinton who voted for the invasion. "By refusing to end the war in Iraq, President Bush is giving the terrorists what they really want, and what the Congress voted to give them in 2002: a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences."


THAT'S where the terrorists are! Darn it, we were shooting up the wrong mall. The terrorists are all in Pakistan. With the WMDs. And Ambrose Bierce.

You're not anti-war, you're just anti-Bush. You still want to fight a war on...I'm never sure which it is: "terror", an emotion, or "terrorism", a tactic. Certainly not a country, right? Because that would really be a war, With, like, rules. Wouldn't want that.

Does anyone remember when Kerry wanted to change the venue to Saudi Arabia?

Does anyone...remember Kerry?

Labels: , , , , , , ,